17-04-2006, 17:55 | #1 |
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Best, NL.
Posts: 240
|
New player
Hi,
I've just sold a player, and now I've 200k on the bank. Since i'm training Forward, and always play 3-4-3, I think it's smart to buy an new extra innermidfield player. Do you guys think the same way? I'm in the 10th division and I need to promote next season (this season I lost it on a game against nr 6 ) So what should be the minimal skills of the player I should buy? Should I consider only playmaking (the main skill) or also the passing skill? Thanks for the help! |
17-04-2006, 18:08 | #2 |
Deity
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lahndan
Posts: 6,220
|
when i was searching for playmakers mistfit told me to watch out for the passing skill as well, so you should get someone who is decnet at it.
__________________
the sooner you fall behind, the more time you\'ll have to catch up! CDZ Cup Champion!!! |
17-04-2006, 18:35 | #3 |
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Best, NL.
Posts: 240
|
Maybe another idea.. Instead of buying a midfielder and keep training forwards, could I buy some you midfielders and switch training to playmaking?? My forwards are all solid.
And for the future, change training to defender after buying some young defenders... Is this a profitable way? Or is it faster to buy better players instead of buying young players and train them. |
17-04-2006, 19:13 | #4 |
King
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: idunno.
Posts: 2,428
|
I'd say if you have started a training program with forwards.. stick with it. PM training is really quite expensive to start with as you can train 6 players fully and another 4 at half rate.
If looking for IM's look for beer leaguers. Older experianced guys.
__________________
Stumbling from pillar to post... |
17-04-2006, 19:31 | #5 |
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Best, NL.
Posts: 240
|
Even 30+ guys? Is the experience so importend?
|
17-04-2006, 19:53 | #6 |
King
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Grantham.
Posts: 1,359
|
Experience is generally useful although apparently the gap between disastrous and wretched is greater than the gap between solid and excellent. I tend to avoid players that are over 30 unless its a temporary purchase although plenty of people do buy them.
Solid scoring is not a good level to sell players at. You should really be looking to wait until they are at least formidable. |
17-04-2006, 19:59 | #7 |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Costa La Haya
Posts: 8,494
|
We're talking 10th division here, Dell...
I think you should spend all the money on a better trainee. Selling forwards at solid is not a good plan, like dell points out. You can make a lot more money if you train solid scorers to formidable (or up). What you should do is buy a 17 y.o. solid or 18 y.o. excellent scorer. Never mind next season, once you have a solid training program you might promote twice in a row. Another thing, I've played 3-4-3 all season and won all my matches. I've come to think that a solid defense is the key with 3-4-3, since you'll lose midfield to midfield trainers all the time. Perhaps a good keeper is the best purchase.
__________________
"Our spam is backed with COMETS!" |