Civ Duel Zone  

Go Back   Civ Duel Zone > Other games > Hattrick forum > CDZ cup
Home

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-09-2014, 14:23   #51
barbu1977
Emperor
 
barbu1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Blame Canada!.
Posts: 3,501
Default

A fifth CDZ cup final and same old story for the Barbiers. I'll never win this stupid thing unless I'm the only team playing.

Good job Chemists!
__________________
Postcount = Postcount + 1; //Postcount++
barbu1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2014, 15:39   #52
Shabbaman
Administrator
 
Shabbaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Costa La Haya
Posts: 8,494
Default

Well, we can do this 30 more seasons.
__________________
"Our spam is backed with COMETS!"
Shabbaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2014, 21:12   #53
akots
Nebuchadnezzar II
 
akots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Glover Park
Posts: 4,459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barbu1977 View Post
A fifth CDZ cup final and same old story for the Barbiers. I'll never win this stupid thing unless I'm the only team playing.

Good job Chemists!
Well, you could have won. I was pressing, so that was tricky with your 4-4-2 but IMO, almost any 3-5-2 further increasing your midfield might have done the job. As it were, all chances were crippled and it was hard to score for you.

I'm still struggling to understand but it seems like against pressing, under current match engine version, best bet is to increase attack or increase midfield. Defense can be lowered as the result. I'm not sure however.
__________________
Cujusvis hominis est errare; nullius, nisi insipientis in errore perseverare
Ciceron (Marcus Tullius)
akots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2014, 21:13   #54
akots
Nebuchadnezzar II
 
akots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Glover Park
Posts: 4,459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shabbaman View Post
Well, we can do this 30 more seasons.
Lets try and see how far it can go.
__________________
Cujusvis hominis est errare; nullius, nisi insipientis in errore perseverare
Ciceron (Marcus Tullius)
akots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2014, 22:21   #55
barbu1977
Emperor
 
barbu1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Blame Canada!.
Posts: 3,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akots View Post
Well, you could have won. I was pressing, so that was tricky with your 4-4-2 but IMO, almost any 3-5-2 further increasing your midfield might have done the job. As it were, all chances were crippled and it was hard to score for you.

I'm still struggling to understand but it seems like against pressing, under current match engine version, best bet is to increase attack or increase midfield. Defense can be lowered as the result. I'm not sure however.
I should have played 3-5-2, but I'm training defense. I needed the extra spot. I must say, I did not go through the process of checking your past alignment, I just made my best formation with 4 defense spots.

This if not the fist time I'm getting beaten by pressing. I must check what to do against a pressing team.
__________________
Postcount = Postcount + 1; //Postcount++
barbu1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2014, 07:05   #56
akots
Nebuchadnezzar II
 
akots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Glover Park
Posts: 4,459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barbu1977 View Post
... I must check what to do against a pressing team.
Pressing just decreases the chances for both sides but has no effect on special events. It does work against long shots if I understand correctly. So, if pressing suppresses 4 events per match (I think I'm between 3 and 4), and without pressing chances were 6 to 4 in your favor, that means that most likely is that 2-3 of you chances are suppressed and 2-1 of my chances are suppressed and 6 to 4 may become either 3-3 or 4-2. Each chance is weighted for scoring (attack vs defense). So, if we get 3-3, you midfield advantage is completely neutralized and only attack vs defense matters. If the match gets 4-2, and my defense is better than your attack which is usually the case for teams playing pressing, you have instead of 6 chances to score only 4 chances. If each chance is let's assume 40%, you score either 3 or 2 goals without pressing or 2 or 1 goals with pressing. By increasing midfield, you can increase chance despite pressing in your favor or increase probability of scoring by increasing attack vs defense.
__________________
Cujusvis hominis est errare; nullius, nisi insipientis in errore perseverare
Ciceron (Marcus Tullius)
akots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2014, 10:41   #57
socralynnek
Moderator
 
socralynnek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USS Defiant
Posts: 3,827
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akots View Post
Pressing just decreases the chances for both sides but has no effect on special events. .
Not a direct effect, but if normal chances are pressed away, then a bigger percentage of the goal opportunities are SEs. So their relative importance grows.

.
Quote:
It does work against long shots if I understand correctly..
Yes (at least against the long shots that come from the long shot tactic.

.
Quote:
So, if pressing suppresses 4 events per match (I think I'm between 3 and 4), and without pressing chances were 6 to 4 in your favor, that means that most likely is that 2-3 of you chances are suppressed and 2-1 of my chances are suppressed and 6 to 4 may become either 3-3 or 4-2. Each chance is weighted for scoring (attack vs defense). So, if we get 3-3, you midfield advantage is completely neutralized and only attack vs defense matters. If the match gets 4-2, and my defense is better than your attack which is usually the case for teams playing pressing, you have instead of 6 chances to score only 4 chances. If each chance is let's assume 40%, you score either 3 or 2 goals without pressing or 2 or 1 goals with pressing. By increasing midfield, you can increase chance despite pressing in your favor or increase probability of scoring by increasing attack vs defense.
If you press, you might be unlucky as well and only press away your chances...

As most of the times, pressing is used if offense is lacking vs defense (or if midfield is lacking), then yes, the counter tactic against pressing should be strengthening attack or specialities IMHO.
But still, against a pressing team, you should not give up too much midfield, as your attack can only score if you get chances...
__________________
Being without a signature since November 2004.
socralynnek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2014, 00:09   #58
akots
Nebuchadnezzar II
 
akots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Glover Park
Posts: 4,459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by socralynnek View Post
... If you press, you might be unlucky as well and only press away your chances...

As most of the times, pressing is used if offense is lacking vs defense (or if midfield is lacking), then yes, the counter tactic against pressing should be strengthening attack or specialities IMHO.
But still, against a pressing team, you should not give up too much midfield, as your attack can only score if you get chances...
Indeed, it is possible. I had it happened a few times.

I use it exclusively when midfield is lacking. It does not help but sometimes, I can draw a lost game and sometimes, score is minimal when I lose. The fans are generally unhappy though but sponsors don't seem to mind. So, I don't think it has financial impact as fans are going to be unhappy anyhow because I'm losing consistently. Whether it is 0-1 (minimal) or 2-4 (without pressing), additional unhappiness has small impact on match attendance. I presume that attendance in not random and depends on weather, position of teams in league, and fan mood. My stadium/arena is constant presumably optimal as I did not touch it for the past 7 or 8 years.
__________________
Cujusvis hominis est errare; nullius, nisi insipientis in errore perseverare
Ciceron (Marcus Tullius)
akots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2014, 14:41   #59
Shabbaman
Administrator
 
Shabbaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Costa La Haya
Posts: 8,494
Default

So I managed to get kicked out of the fake cup, how about a new round of CDZ fun?
__________________
"Our spam is backed with COMETS!"
Shabbaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2014, 02:46   #60
akots
Nebuchadnezzar II
 
akots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Glover Park
Posts: 4,459
Default

Anytime, just fire it up.
__________________
Cujusvis hominis est errare; nullius, nisi insipientis in errore perseverare
Ciceron (Marcus Tullius)
akots is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:41.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.