![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Emperor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Netherlands.
Posts: 3,196
|
![]()
Make it so!
__________________
Vrooooooooooommmmmm ![]() ![]() Stapel doesn't like cricket |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Emperor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: HAWK!.
Posts: 4,365
|
![]()
I did not get any spam yet, shabba!
__________________
One more turn..... just one more turn... one MORE! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Emperor
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA, East Coast.
Posts: 2,673
|
![]()
The Spam Bunny sent me a message, and I can probably fit in a game, though I'm running Win7 so I don't know what havok I'll create with pitboss
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Chieftain
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: .
Posts: 214
|
![]()
Oh hey, spam
![]() I'm still in, things just have been pretty quiet and I haven't been playing much Civ lately. So a nice pitboss is just what I need!
__________________
Supreme Ruler of Nicodemia | Cave Canem |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Chieftain
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 48
|
![]()
The spam has interested me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Costa La Haya
Posts: 8,494
|
![]()
Well, that's even more effective than I'd hoped for
![]()
__________________
"Our spam is backed with COMETS!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
Nebuchadnezzar II
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Glover Park
Posts: 4,459
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Win7 does not have to be a problem. It has similar firewall and security settings as Vista and you might want to click a few buttons to give Civ-related traffic complete access. IMO, hosting the game (PB or even regular MP) is tricky but playing shouldn't be a problem as long as Civ runs fine and you have real IP address either dynamic or static.
__________________
Cujusvis hominis est errare; nullius, nisi insipientis in errore perseverare Ciceron (Marcus Tullius) Last edited by akots; 25-09-2009 at 20:10. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Chieftain
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brazil.
Posts: 194
|
![]()
here am I, the offspring of the spam
![]() well, i admit I almost forgot my brothers of CDZ, tragic, tragic... but I`ve reborn, due to spam bunny, thanks man! ![]() And i do want to play this pitboss, it will be fine. btw, is there any other thread with the rules? And ill forward some questions. - Why not diplo victory? because de resolutions only or there are another tricks? - About vassal states, i isnt that waste whe we face some quiting... As is supose when one quites their civ becomes an AI. And its better a vassal stupid AI than one free. - Another experiences makes me question about the possible order of playing. To avoid such a double moviment as players to standing online to try avoiding it manualy. - And what about civ and map choices? Nice to see you all again. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USS Defiant
Posts: 3,827
|
![]()
I am ready and I am fine with no diplo as a setting.
(Short version for wosret: The last game saw a diplo win and it was, let's say, a maybe strange kind of winning, especially with Apostolic Palace)
__________________
Being without a signature since November 2004. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Costa La Haya
Posts: 8,494
|
![]()
Because some people don't appreciate it when they're about to win and somebody pulls off a apostolic palace vote. Welcome back btw!
__________________
"Our spam is backed with COMETS!" |
![]() |
![]() |