Civs vs Civs - Page 11

Tubby Rower · 27-10-2006, 16:17

well since I suck at MP games and need a civ to help me out as a crutch

, does anyone want to ally from the beginning.

Robboo · 27-10-2006, 22:02

sure tubby

BCLG100 · 28-10-2006, 02:38

i thought we had decided that everyone was at war with everyone else?

Robboo · 28-10-2006, 03:18

always war? or just no allinaces?

Shouldnt Tubby knwo thsi since he started thsi game

BCLG100 · 28-10-2006, 03:26

always war- it saves on the WW.

Tubby Rower · 28-10-2006, 13:10

yes aleays war .. I was being funny... apparently not good enough material [

]

DaveShack · 29-10-2006, 00:14

Got the PM, wish this forum sent emails when PMs arrive like some others I frequent...

Now I'll go check the mapmaking forum to see if it's already been delivered.

Edit: Hasn't been posted in the mapmaking forum, so obviously hasn't been picked up there...

Do y'all want this set up as teams instead of permanent alliances? When playing 2 civs as a team, you share techs and resources without having to make deals with yourself, and both civs can research the same tech at double speed if that's what you want to do.

In the meantime, I'll see what the WB will do, and will also hold off to see if Akots is already doing it, or not.

DaveShack · 29-10-2006, 01:54

Followup question, do you want the 2 civs on each team to be adjacent, or separated? Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, especially if the separated placements are fairly random.

Tubby Rower · 29-10-2006, 02:49

the teams that you describe is what we want. also the teams should be permanently at war with each other. And yes the two civs should be adjacent.

Robi D · 29-10-2006, 04:51

Yay progress

The one good thing about AW is that no one can complain they were

27-10-2006, 16:17	#101
Tubby Rower Moderator Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Middle of VA. Posts: 3,896	well since I suck at MP games and need a civ to help me out as a crutch , does anyone want to ally from the beginning. __________________ 3/2006 : Now, surely that must be because some fists might have caused internal damage to certain delicate parts?

28-10-2006, 02:38	#103
BCLG100 Deity Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Lahndan Posts: 6,220	i thought we had decided that everyone was at war with everyone else? __________________ the sooner you fall behind, the more time you\'ll have to catch up! CDZ Cup Champion!!!

28-10-2006, 03:26	#105
BCLG100 Deity Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Lahndan Posts: 6,220	always war- it saves on the WW. __________________ the sooner you fall behind, the more time you\'ll have to catch up! CDZ Cup Champion!!!

28-10-2006, 13:10	#106
Tubby Rower Moderator Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Middle of VA. Posts: 3,896	yes aleays war .. I was being funny... apparently not good enough material [] __________________ 3/2006 : Now, surely that must be because some fists might have caused internal damage to certain delicate parts?

29-10-2006, 00:14	#107
DaveShack Chieftain Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: USA - Arizona (gmt-7). Posts: 50	Got the PM, wish this forum sent emails when PMs arrive like some others I frequent... Now I'll go check the mapmaking forum to see if it's already been delivered. Edit: Hasn't been posted in the mapmaking forum, so obviously hasn't been picked up there... Do y'all want this set up as teams instead of permanent alliances? When playing 2 civs as a team, you share techs and resources without having to make deals with yourself, and both civs can research the same tech at double speed if that's what you want to do. In the meantime, I'll see what the WB will do, and will also hold off to see if Akots is already doing it, or not. __________________ Show your Warlords 1v1 skills at Bilko\'s Battleroom

27-10-2006, 22:02	#102
Robboo King Join Date: May 2006 Location: Cajun Country. Posts: 2,002	sure tubby

28-10-2006, 03:18	#104
Robboo King Join Date: May 2006 Location: Cajun Country. Posts: 2,002	always war? or just no allinaces? Shouldnt Tubby knwo thsi since he started thsi game

29-10-2006, 01:54	#108
DaveShack Chieftain Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: USA - Arizona (gmt-7). Posts: 50	Followup question, do you want the 2 civs on each team to be adjacent, or separated? Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, especially if the separated placements are fairly random. __________________ Show your Warlords 1v1 skills at Bilko\'s Battleroom

29-10-2006, 02:49	#109
Tubby Rower Moderator Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Middle of VA. Posts: 3,896	the teams that you describe is what we want. also the teams should be permanently at war with each other. And yes the two civs should be adjacent. __________________ 3/2006 : Now, surely that must be because some fists might have caused internal damage to certain delicate parts?

29-10-2006, 04:51	#110
Robi D King Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Adelaide, Australia. Posts: 2,060	Yay progress The one good thing about AW is that no one can complain they were __________________ "I'm altering the deal, prey I don't alter it further" Darth Vader "We shall defend what is ours. We shall never surrender" --Kosovo is Serbia!